<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best Quote About Lisp (That&#8217;s No Longer Valid)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pchristensen.com/blog/articles/best-quote-about-lisp-thats-no-longer-valid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pchristensen.com/blog/articles/best-quote-about-lisp-thats-no-longer-valid/</link>
	<description>Peter Christensen's Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Weinreb</title>
		<link>http://www.pchristensen.com/blog/articles/best-quote-about-lisp-thats-no-longer-valid/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Weinreb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 12:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pchristensen.com/blog/articles/best-quote-about-lisp-thats-no-longer-valid/#comment-450</guid>
		<description>Python and Ruby and Java have borrowed a lot of good ideas from Lisp.  There are things about Lisp that used to be novel and nearly unique, such as garbage collection, that have moved into the mainstream.  So even if Lisp is not one of the prominent languages in use today (we&#039;re working on that!), it has had a lot of influence.

About &quot;special purpose&quot;, a great thing about Lisp is that you get the best of both worlds.  Common Lisp is a general purpose language.  But when you want/need a special purpose language, you can just build it in Common Lisp, using macros and other facilities.  That&#039;s hugely faster than writing a whole new language system from scratch!  A lot has been written about these &quot;little languages&quot; and it&#039;s one of the most important things about Common Lisp both in theory and in practice.

At my shop (ITA Software), we use C primarily when we have to do a whole lot of bit-level manipulation - I&#039;m talking about huge amounts, where the performance benefit of C&#039;s special-purpose ability to do this is overwhelming.  We also have used C for writing Apache modules and stuff like that.  But it&#039;s the language of last resort.  We use Java and Python a lot, too, though there are more lines of Common Lisp than anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Python and Ruby and Java have borrowed a lot of good ideas from Lisp.  There are things about Lisp that used to be novel and nearly unique, such as garbage collection, that have moved into the mainstream.  So even if Lisp is not one of the prominent languages in use today (we&#8217;re working on that!), it has had a lot of influence.</p>
<p>About &#8220;special purpose&#8221;, a great thing about Lisp is that you get the best of both worlds.  Common Lisp is a general purpose language.  But when you want/need a special purpose language, you can just build it in Common Lisp, using macros and other facilities.  That&#8217;s hugely faster than writing a whole new language system from scratch!  A lot has been written about these &#8220;little languages&#8221; and it&#8217;s one of the most important things about Common Lisp both in theory and in practice.</p>
<p>At my shop (ITA Software), we use C primarily when we have to do a whole lot of bit-level manipulation &#8211; I&#8217;m talking about huge amounts, where the performance benefit of C&#8217;s special-purpose ability to do this is overwhelming.  We also have used C for writing Apache modules and stuff like that.  But it&#8217;s the language of last resort.  We use Java and Python a lot, too, though there are more lines of Common Lisp than anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisp is Great Because It&#8217;s An Ordinary Language &#187; What&#8217;s In Peter&#8217;s Head</title>
		<link>http://www.pchristensen.com/blog/articles/best-quote-about-lisp-thats-no-longer-valid/comment-page-1/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisp is Great Because It&#8217;s An Ordinary Language &#187; What&#8217;s In Peter&#8217;s Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pchristensen.com/blog/articles/best-quote-about-lisp-thats-no-longer-valid/#comment-255</guid>
		<description>[...] and books, and doing some programming of my own. And the answer I came up was that Lisp is simply a great general purpose language. And since everyone else has the same wariness about any &#8220;Most Extremest EVER!!!!&#8221;, I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and books, and doing some programming of my own. And the answer I came up was that Lisp is simply a great general purpose language. And since everyone else has the same wariness about any &#8220;Most Extremest EVER!!!!&#8221;, I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
